Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FWIW ...

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:52:00PM +0000, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
> Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.
>

Isn't that exactly the complaint?  Something like, "Long periods of
co-existence need to have lots of benefits or an existential one, or
else they're not a good idea."

Andrew didn't point this out, but since TSVAREA has been paying attention to it for the past couple of IETF cycles, the IAB does have https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-protocol-transitions/ in active development. 

We're finding it helpful. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Spencer 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]