Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx> · Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:48:54 +0000

    Forwarding here, because Arnt only replied to the JMAP mailing
      list and my reply to him went to the same place.

      -------- Forwarded Message --------

            Subject:

            Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol
              (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

            Date: 
            Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:48:54 +0000

            From: 
            Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>

            To: 
            Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
              jmap@xxxxxxxx

      On 08/02/2017 12:56, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> Randy Bush writes:
>> yet another protocol that requires a flag day.  that has worked out
>> so well for ipv6.
>
> JMAP does not, AFAICT, require a flag day, any more than IMAP required 
> a flag day over POP. If Fastmail's deployment of JMAP-in-spe was 
> noticed by its customers, the noise certainly hasn't been loud enough 
> that I've heard about it.

Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.