Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Would something like this help?
>> (borrowed from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_MTU_Discovery)
>> 
>> "Many network security devices block all ICMP messages for perceived
>>  security benefits, including the errors that are necessary for the proper
>>  operation of PMTUD. This can result in connections that complete the
>>  TCP three-way handshake correctly, but then hang when data is transferred.
>>  This state is referred to as a black hole connection."
> 
> Yes. What we are asked to do for Internet Standard is show that a protocol
> is widely deployed and is interoperable. That's undoubtedly true of RFC1981.
> The fact that it also has an important failure mode should certainly be
> documented, but I suspect that every Internet Standard has at least
> one important failure mode.

the problem is that this particular failure mode is essentially "does
not work on the real internet."  perhaps documenting that is useful.
but i guess this is ipv6.

randy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]