Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:33:34 -0800
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5915124b-4f5e-6746-ec0a-23254e1bd3f5@rozanak.com>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <20170127194324.GB38766@mx2.yitter.info> <5915124b-4f5e-6746-ec0a-23254e1bd3f5@rozanak.com>

Hi Hosnieh,

The current thread is interesting.  It reminds me of "the greater good".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

References:
- If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Dave Burstein
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Hosnieh Rafiee

Prev by Date: Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-08
Next by Date: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Previous by thread: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Next by thread: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]