The other thing to think about is the issue of people from the US travelling to non-US venues and then being refused re-entry into the US. Works both ways....
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/27/17 10:43 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I note that there is a WG, MTGVENUE, that is working on criteria for
> meeting venues. It seems to me that discussing the overall question
> of specific exclusions at a venue for individuals on the basis of some
> set of class properties (whether it be nationality, religion, choices
> in emotional relationships, or whatever) would be appropriate in that
> WG. Moreover, since the WG hasn't finished its work perhaps the WG
> list would be better to explore the issue than the IETF list.
Indeed, and the question of whether what's currently in the draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc- )venue-selection-process/? include_text=1
on that question is sufficient is currently under discussion. Note
that the goal is to provide guidance from the IETF to the IAOC on
questions like this.
Melinda
Clint Chaplin
Principal Standards Engineer
Samsung Research America
Principal Standards Engineer
Samsung Research America