On 25/01/2017 21:53, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > > On 24/01/2017 23:11, Franck Martin wrote: >> I think it is time to move to the next level of IPv6 deployment. >> >> Ideally the IETF WiFi network should now only provide the following 2 >> networks: >> 1)IPv6-only >> 2)IPv6-only with NAT64 >> >> The later should be the default network. >> >> However you would say, well some stuff will break, some non technical >> people will use the IETF network and may have a bad experience, etc... >> >> So to be conservative but at the same time futurist and like it was >> done a few years back, why not create again an IPv4 outage of a few >> hours where the above 2 networks would be the only networks available? >> >> Depending on results, this outage could be expanded to a full day at >> the following meeting, until the IPv4 network is totally removed from >> the WiFi? > > How about those that designed IPv6 and their ADs subject themselves to > this regime and report to the rest of us how they got on? I've helped a bit, and I exercise the model suggested by RFC1671 most days. It works. I see no reason to subject myself to an artificial restriction. Brian