Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> we have had to fight massively with vendors to make it classless.
>> please do not give them excuses to break things.
>
> On a lot of hardware /65 - /126 is not very well-supported.

guess the business reason why.  the classful spec gave them a good
excuse to do a tcam rinse repeat.  i pay to feed the darned  chickens,
it's time to break the egg.

But it's true that supporting /65-/126 increases the cost of the device. The extra bits have to go somewhere. I think I've seen hardware that just converted all prefixes to 128 bit if there was at least one /65 - /126 prefix in the FIB. That costs money for RAM. Obviously that's silly if those prefixes are frequent, and you can save that money using better software engineering - but software engineering costs money too. Prefixes don't cost money, and if we know that we won't run out of them, what's the problem?

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]