Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> but i am having a hard time reconciling 2.4.4's insistence on a
>> mandatory 64-bit uuid in all unicast global addresses with 2.4.0, rfc
>> 6141, widespread operational practice, ...  clue bat please.
> 
> This was discussed extensively in 6MAN and resulted in RFC7421
> "Analysis of the 64-bit Boundary in IPv6 Addressing”.  The text in
> rfc4291bis is:
> 
>    For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary
>    value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long.
>    Background on the 64 bit boundary in IPv6 addresses can be found in
>    [RFC7421].

thanks for the review that the wg came to this decision in conflict with
operational practice and its own statement in 2.4.0.  i did read the
documents.

since it is incorrect, ietf last call seems to be the time to fix it.

to be clear, i have no problem with iids being 64-bit.  my issue is with
unicast globals being classful in 2.4.4.

randy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]