Re: I-D Action: draft-iab-ccg-appoint-process-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:49:29AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Could you add something about the expectation being to arrange staggered
> terms, so that a simultaneous turnover of all three members can be avoided?
> This doesn't have to be a rule, just an intention.

The IAB's plan is to put that intention into its internal policies,
instead, on the grounds that it will be obvious to any competent IAB
that complete turnover is undesirable without tying a future IAB's
hands if something dramatic happens.  Is it enough that you know that?

A (for myself)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]