Looks good. Just three comments.
Is there any reason this should not be a BCP? It discusses an IETF matter,
even though it comes from the IAB.
> 3.1. Duration of Appointment
>
> Each of the CCG Representatives is expected to serve for at least a
> year. Each year the IAB will seek input from the IETF community to
> determine whether a personnel change is appropriate.
Could you add something about the expectation being to arrange staggered
terms, so that a simultaneous turnover of all three members can be avoided?
This doesn't have to be a rule, just an intention.
>
> 7. IANA Considerations
>
> This document has no actions for IANA.
>
> {{{ RFC Editor: Please remove this section prior to publication. }}}
That request is inconsistent with https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-18#section-9.1
Regards
Brian Carpenter