On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:49:02PM +0300,
Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 45 lines which said:
> Thank you for your opinion and fast support, Jordi.
Jordi tried to patiently explain, I'm not sure you can call his
message "support".
> 1. I am not sure that about privacy. Nobody need your IP while you do not
> do something wrong.
Usual argument from the police ("if you want privacy, it means you are
a criminal trying to hide something"). You will have a hard time
convincing people to buy it.
> 3. I meant usage of SLAAC for all ip-addresses (now it is optional).
And why? I mean, servers typically use static non-SLAAC addresses. Why
should they change?
> Link is below:
> http://www.slideshare.net/phdays/ipv6-35204784
6 slides can hardly be regarded as a proposal worth of IETF time.
> Should I try to write to WG called ipsecme?
Please first learn to respond to emails (instead of starting a new
thread each time).