Jordi, It's very common for committees to appoint sub-committees, within their range of responsibilities, and for sub-committees to coopt experts. I am not in the least shocked by this; in fact given the expansion of the IASA's workload over the last 10 years it seems entirely normal to me. I don't think anything has been hidden, and of course the IAOC as a whole remains responsible for the work of IASA subcommittees, according to section 3.2 of RFC4071. Specifically "The IAOC's mission is not to be engaged in the day-to-day administrative work of the IASA, but rather to provide appropriate direction, oversight, and approval." Regards Brian On 16/11/2016 23:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > All the IETF positions have rules to be selected, nomcom, etc., and there is a great transparency on the process. > > However today we discovered that new members have been selected for IAOC committees. > > What have been the rules/process for that? > > One of the questions that have been discussed several times is the lack of transparency from the IAOC, and clearly here we have a new demonstration of that. > > I hope there is a clear statement from IAOC explaining the process. > > If that not happens, what is the process to appeal that decision, so I can follow it? > > We as a community, in my opinion, can’t keep going with this lack of transparency. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.consulintel.es > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. > > > >