Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "ipv6@xxxxxxxx" <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10.
From: Octavio Alvarez <octalietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:09:54 -0800
In-reply-to: <HE1PR04MB144939A28C2E3052402511A8BDBC0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB144939A28C2E3052402511A8BDBC0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0

On 11/14/2016 03:38 AM, Khaled Omar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> Is there anything we can add to the IPv10 draft or the standard will be
> the same as the draft?

How do you plan to have an IPv4-only (no IPv10) host to communicate with
an IPv6-only (no IPv10) host?

Best regards.

References:
- IPv10.
  - From: Khaled Omar

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> (Recommendation on Stable IPv6 Interface Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> (Recommendation on Stable IPv6 Interface Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: IPv10.
Next by thread: NomCom Cal for Feedback and Office Hours: IETF 97
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]