Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Khaled,

I understand that irony, sarcasm, and implicit statements can get lost
in translation; as such, I wanted to reply once in no uncertain terms
to avoid any confusion.


Your proposal will not become a RFC.

It uses a technique which was actively removed from the standard and
even if that was not the case, it's way too late. We took ~20 years to
get to the level of IPv6 adoption we have today. Any gains made during
that time would be removed with any, even partial, technology reset.
And this ignores the fact that IPv4 is almost at the end of its useful
life and will largely be replaced; prolonging that process is not in
the interest of the IETF nor of the networking community.

While you are free to follow the process of writing and submitting an
actual ID, believe me when I say that this will not become a RFC.


Richard




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]