As the draft is probably about IETF process, not RFC Editor rules, I
would think that ietf@xxxxxxxx would be the venue for discussing the
draft, unless Jari thinks it needs a separate list (which I doubt).
Yours,
Joel
On 9/15/16 8:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
I noticed that as well in the announcement. The proper place to discuss
this draft is most probably rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> .
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Note to Readers
>
> This draft should be discussed on the wgchairs mailing list [1].
Um, no. That's a closed list.
Regards
Brian