On Wed, 25 May 2016, nalini.elkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >>On 5/25/16 6:17 AM, nalini.elkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> So, it is not OK to put an additional burden sometimes on GLBT people > >> but it is OK to put an additional burden on Asian and African and > >> other people as far as cost, racism, visa, etc, etc? > > >Perhaps we should regard this as an opportunity to talk > >about which forms of bigotry we'll accommodate and which > >we won't. > > Well said. > > Nalini > In an ideal world, there would be no travel costs, no visa barriers, no discrimination and no bureaucracies to deal with. We don't live in such a world. Until we do, this isn't a matter of what type of bigotry is worse or better IMO, it's about making practical choices about meeting locations (assuming we still want to have physical meetings). Every meeting we hold excludes some number of people for numerous reasons, hopefully it's not the same people every time. (Yes, I know some people are not able to attend at all for economic reasons, but that's not a problem solved by the 1-1-1 model unless by sheer luck we land a meeting in someone's "back yard") Ole