Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/24/16 12:26, Yoav Nir wrote:
Anyway, (2) would exclude me and about a dozen of our regulars. Gun ownership by citizens does not exclude anyone. 

Right, and that's exactly my point. Jari's formulation here is, I think, a good one: "I might for instance have some opinions about a country’s policies or practices, but me visiting that country am reasonably not affected by those policies. I hope when we evaluate meetings for the practical can-meet aspect (with everything that is implied by that), not for the long list of in-principle issues."

I do not doubt that it sucks to be a gay or bisexual male living in Singapore. Spending a week there for work should be fine.

I'll again agree with Jari's formulation, adding emphasis to the final three cited words: "I think it is of course necessary to consider things that affect the ability to enter, safety (possibly including usual human activities that people do outside meetings anyway, families travelling along)".

/a

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]