Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

Sorry for the late feedback

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016–5-24

IETF LC End Date: 2016–5-17

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP  RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

I am wondering about the lack of normative language for example in section 4.11

   “When reviewing a document that asks IANA to create a new registry or change a registration policy to any policy more stringent than Expert Review or Specification Required, the IESG should ask for justification to ensure that more relaxed policies have been considered and that the strict policy is the right one.”

Is the “should” normative here?

 Nits/editorial comments:

 

 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]