Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 19:16:22 +0200
Cc: iaoc@xxxxxxxx, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5C31B46E-1528-44DE-AF3E-7E5CDC32636F@iii.ca>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> I’m not a fan of the current choice for IETF 100.

nor am i.  it is true that there is no perfect venue.  but there are
less imperfect venues, and this ain't one.

randy

References:
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  - From: Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  - From: Allison Mankin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  - From: Cullen Jennings

Prev by Date: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
Previous by thread: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]