RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had characterized the expedition to BA as an example of getting on the bus to Abilene.

Yours Irrespectively,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:13 AM
> To: Melinda Shore; Eliot Lear; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request
> for input
> 
> On 5/22/2016 2:04 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> > Allow me to suggest that avoiding disadvantaging people who do not
> > actually participate might be somewhat lower priority than avoiding
> > disadvantaging those who do.
> 
> +10
> 
> The model which asserts that choosing meeting venues is a way to recruit participants has
> no objective basis -- and that's after 30 years of opportunity to demonstrate otherwise. It
> frankly serves to work against the basic goal of having most work done on mailing lists, by
> selling a cultural view that meetings are primary.
> 
> Anyone who wants to participate in the IETF already can.  All they need is an Internet
> connection.  It doesn't even have to be a good one, since IETF list mail only consumes
> extremely low bandwidth and is an asynchronous form of use.
> 
> F2F meetings permit /added/ efficiency for those who are /already/ participating.
> 
> Moving the venue is /not/ for permitting attendance by those who otherwise can't attend,
> but (is supposed to be) to share the pain among those who do attend.
> 
> The outreach goal cited for some venue choices is well-intentioned but unfortunately
> misguided and probably counter-productive to the IETF's main work.
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/23/2016 7:01 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> > I only wish that was true. While we try to go back to venues that have
> > worked well, they are often not available on the dates when we want to
> > meet.
> 
> While that is sometimes the case, of course, it is not the primary reason we keep seeking
> new venues (independent of the occasional social outreach experiment.)
> 
> The primary reason we vary the cities so much is to try to get sponsors and hosts.
> 
> 
> d/
> --
> 
>    Dave Crocker
>    Brandenburg InternetWorking
>    bbiw.net





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]