Re: Time to kill layer 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Phillip,

Layer 2 isn't just one thing. Do you specifically mean to eliminate layer-2 addresses, or something more?

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 4/14/2016 9:32 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This problem is solved in a multicast way with mDNS and DNSSD.
No, the problem is 'addressed'. If it was solved, it would work.

The problem is that it isn't working and I can't identify a single
point of failure. Whenever that happens, it is the standard at fault.


DNSSD is
working on a way to make this work better in a multiple-subnet environment.
I'm hoping to produce a solution for homenet that allows devices to register
using unicast rather than multicast and does a better job of actually
tracking what services are connected to the network.   You can see a bit of
this in the -00 of the homenet naming architecture document.
Going to unicast should help. Multicast configuration really doesn't
work on a network with as many hubs and devices as mine has.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]