Hi Brian, Ted, Spencer,
At 13:32 12-04-2016, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Of course it is. But (compared to the IESG) the IAOC does deal with a
comparatively large fraction of issues that have confidential aspects -
I'll skip this as there is a comment at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97822.html
At 13:33 12-04-2016, Ted Lemon wrote:
I feel I can speak as an authority on this topic
when I say that there is zero chance that this
is a problem. Â If the IAOC do not always do
what we want, it is because (a) that is
impossible, since there is no "we" that is both
in agreement and also representative of the
wishes of all IETF participants and (b) I know
everybody on the IAOC and they just don't behave
as if they think complaining by IESG people is a problem.
Ok.
At 13:51 12-04-2016, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
SM, if you're talking about people in
"leadership" (is that what we are?) asking
questions of the IAOC on the IETF mailing list, you may very well be right.
The term "leadership" was used in the message at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77723.html
But I do drop notes to the IAOC directly, either
to the IAD or to the overall IAOC, and I don't
know how anyone in the broader community would know that I've done that.
Ok.
Regards,
-sm