Re: Concerns about Singapore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




This surprises me - "this has been a condition placed on hosts...".
Could you enlighten us as to which [and I'll try to be precise here]
other IETFs had a condition where the content accessible by the IETF
network was markedly different from the content of say the network at a
local Starbuck's equivalent wifi hot spot just down the street from the
IETF and where that was mandated by the hosts and/or local laws?


A basic issue that seems to distinguish a number of venue concerns is whether constraints are state-imposed or are only the choice of the local site operator. Negotiating variations for site-imposed constraints is fundamentally different and fundamentally more problematic (or impossible) than for state-imposed ones.

As far as I'm aware, Beijing has been the only venue where Internet access issues ran into state-imposed restrictions.

If I've heard folk correctly, that distinction seems to be the essence of what is being expressed against Singapore.

d/


--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]