There are some issues here. First, who can challenge a nomcom volunteer's elegibility? Second, what process is followed if their eligibility is challenged? This actually seems a lot harder than some of the other proposals that were put forth, which simply extended eligibility of the same type to more IETF participants, rather than creating two classes of IETF participants.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, we'll know by August if the experiment resulted in more volunteers.
My only concern is that we decide it was ineffective in getting more diverse
volunteers, and stop; but it might have needed more than 1 year to socialize
the ideas out there.
A result might also be: the new rules cause no harm and should be kept until
such time we have more data.