Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:29:48 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <09ff01d1905c$f15d4e70$d417eb50$@olddog.co.uk>

> On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:34 PM, adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> How do we move on so:
> - this problem stops being a problem for IETF 100
> - this problem does not recur

That would be a very relevant conversation on mtgvenue@xxxxxxxx.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

References:
- "We did not know" is not a good excuse
  - From: Adrian Farrel

Prev by Date: RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
Next by Date: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
Previous by thread: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
Next by thread: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]