Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/04/16 17:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Overall IAOC transparency question is worth another thread, I think.

I reckon I do agree with you and John on that. It's pretty
easy for well intended folks to end up not being transparent
and well worth spending a bit of time/effort on seeing if
we can match current expectations met elsewhere whilst also
being efficient with all the myriad of IAOC stuff that is being
done well.

S.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]