On 3/31/16 11:29 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > A registration requirement for remote participants is a major > policy change and one for people who merely want to passively > observe is something I believe the community has several times > concluded is inappropriate given privacy, etc., concerns. So, > who made this decision and how? Unless the answer involves a > community discussion and Last Call or equivalent process that I > missed (and apparently Melinda did too), if the answer to "who > decided" involves anyone in the IETF Leadership, would they > please offer to resign? I think you are accusing the community selected committee members of malfeasance. At least now we are clear on where we stand. We have advanced No BCP or standards track document to describe requirements or procedures for the operation of remote participation nor should we IMHO unless: We view it as a core function of the IETF activiity. It is mature enough that the thing we describe is neither obsoleted or overtaken by events or at least is not focused on the technology and method of delivery before the document is published.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature