this was the (strong?) consensus of the IPR BOF Scott > On Mar 30, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Section 1 (Definitions), subsection k says the following: > >> Without limiting the generality of the >> foregoing, acting as a working group chair or Area Director >> constitutes "Participating" in all activities of the relevant >> working group or area. > > The AD of a large area may not get to read all individual I-Ds or all > email messages sent in all the WGs of the area. We may want to define > this a bit more explicitly. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > On 22/03/2016 2:17 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> All, >> >> RFC 3979 was published in 2005. Since then we’ve gathered a lot of experience, and we’d like to update the RFC with that experience. This isn’t a revolution of the IETF IPR approach, it is mostly about clarification, better documentation, and recognising some other new RFCs and changes. But the document itself has changed quite a lot and structured differently than RFC 3979 was. >> >> Some of the main issues (such as how to define participation) were discussed in the IETF-87 meeting, but there are also a number of other changes in this document. Please give this document a careful read, and let us know your feedback. >> >> I am starting a last call on this document today, but gave a longer last call period to make sure everyone has enough time to comment after IETF-95 as well. And thanks for the comments that some of you have already sent after the document was published; we’ve observed them and will make them part of the feedback from the Last Call. >> >> The document is available here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis/ >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08 >> >> Jari Arkko (as the responsible AD for this document) >> >