--On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 14:46 +0100 Dave Cridland
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps simply:
>
> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
> "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",
> "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
> interpreted as described in RFC 2119 when capitalised.
I think that is an improvement even if I have some doubts that
it will make much difference. The difference should, IMO, pivot
on whether 2119 is normatively referenced as a source of those
definitions.
john