hello andrew. On 2016-02-04 07:07, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
Interesting draft, but it should certainly contain references to RFCs 5226 and 7500, and you wouldn’t want to duplicate any information contained in either of those RFCs. For example, there’s some amount of commonality between section 5.3 of this draft and section 6.4 of RFC 5226.
very useful pointers, thanks! i will look at those RFCs, add them as references to the draft, and will try to make sure that there is no/little overlap, and some alignment.
i have added your feedback as an open issue for the draft: https://github.com/dret/I-D/issues/26 thanks and cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@xxxxxxxx | | http://dret.net/netdret | | http://twitter.com/dret |