Interesting draft, but it should certainly contain references to RFCs 5226 and 7500, and you wouldn’t want to duplicate any information contained in either of those RFCs. For example, there’s some amount of commonality between section 5.3 of this draft and section 6.4 of RFC 5226.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:28 PM, <internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
Title : The Use of Registries
Author : Erik Wilde
Filename : draft-wilde-registries-01.txt
Pages : 13
Date : 2016-02-03
Abstract:
Registries on the Internet and the Web fulfill a wide range of tasks,
ranging from low-level networking aspects such as packet type
identifiers, all the way to application-level protocols and
standards. This document summarizes some of the reasons of why and
how to use registries, and how some of them are operated. It serves
as a informative reference for specification writers considering
whether to create and manage a registry, allowing them to better
understand some of the issues associated with certain design
discussions.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilde-registries/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-registries-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wilde-registries-01
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt