On 1/28/16, 15:52, "Joe Touch" <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yeah, and I seem to recall some kind of rathole/vortex around what the >> original intent of I-Ds was vs. what they are today. I’ll stipulate the >> position above rather than head anywhere near that. > >IMO the confusion lies with the concept of "ephemeral" vs. "but I >*really* want it, even though I should have no right to it", which led >to a redefinition of the concept of "ephemeral" as it applies to IDs. >See below... Absolutely not. This is me, going the other direction at Warp 9.8. -- Ted Faber <theodore.v.faber@xxxxxxxx> Engineering Specialist Computer Systems Research Department 310-336-7373