Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> To say this another way, using github (or other collaboration tools) is great for authors or a design team to work together to develop an Internet draft.  I do this myself.  I think the dividing line is that drafts should continue to be submitted via the datatracker as they are now and working groups be using the datatracker to do their work.  I would be very concerned if working groups started to do their work outside of the datatracker.

Agreed.  It’s also worth noting that any addition to a document - made in a ‘shared document repository’ that's available to the working group as a whole - is quite clearly an “IETF Contribution” as defined by RFC 3979.  We need to be sure that all such edits - including any subsequent deletions or modifications of added text - will get recorded in an ‘audit trail’, and can be made available in response to a subpoena.

There are people out there who think that I’m “stuck in the '90s” (yes, people’s IETF-related postings to social media are publicly-searchable; you live by the sword, you die by the sword :-), but there are real dangers if we start allowing collaborative work within IETF working groups to be conducted using third-party services.

	Ross.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]