Eliot, > On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:55 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jari, > > I have no conceptual problem with github being used for draft > development or being integrated in our tools process for state changes, > or archiving of discussions, but I would maintain strong objections to > any approach that would lead to bifurcation of discussion on a topic. > That is- the technology and our relationships with those providing the > service should be conducive to a single integrated conversation on a topic. To say this another way, using github (or other collaboration tools) is great for authors or a design team to work together to develop an Internet draft. I do this myself. I think the dividing line is that drafts should continue to be submitted via the datatracker as they are now and working groups be using the datatracker to do their work. I would be very concerned if working groups started to do their work outside of the datatracker. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail