On 01/26/2016 04:56 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I have no objection to people using github for internet draft preparation. > I have some concerns with working groups requiring it, in part because I > like our tradition of allowing folks to use whatever tooling they are > comfortable with. This is counter-balanced to some degree by the > importance of making it easy for the working group to have control over > the draft content. The IETF non-WG CodeMatch mailing list only seems to use the mailing list to announce a new online or phone meeting. You *have* to go to github in order to see anything of significance. My fear is that a WG will start using github as the method of communications and only announcing someone pushed information to github. (like CodeMatch does now) Hosting your own github like service is not that difficult. Git comes with a simple service that provides web interface for servers. I don't care if its the IETF or github as both methods would allow for making complete copies and public access. -- Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US) DouglasRoyer@xxxxxxxxx 714-989-6135
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>