Le 15/01/2016 01:00, John C Klensin a écrit :
[...]
:-) there is active ISO liaison.
Not sure what you are thinking about. We've never had a liaison to
ISO: it really wouldn't make any sense even if either we or they were
interested. We've never even had a liaison to ISO/IEC JTC1. One
could argue either way about a JTC1 liaison making sense, but the
politics, justification, and interest have never come together at the
same time to make that happen. We do have active liaison
relationships with a number of ISO TCs and a number of ISO/IEC JTC1
SCs but, AFAIK, none of them are working on the OSI stack any more
either.
YEs, that's what I meant about liaison to ISO Technical Committees,
although one could argue about working or not working on OSI stack.
Common IETF discussion uses terms inherited from the OSI layer terminology.
And many ISO TC documents make extensive use of IETF protocols like IPv6.
Alex
john