Hi Alexey, On 12/14/15 3:51 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote: >> >> At this point I would suggest that the discussion on this topic has exceeded >> the mandate for the list. I would suggest that creating a separate list and >> announcing it and moving all further discussion on the specifics of this >> proposal to that list would be appropriate. >> >> At the beginning of this discussion the question was asked of why the >> sergeant at arms threatened posting restriction. I wasn't actually >> surprised at that PR warning as we've already got a replacement for IPv4 in >> the form of IPv6. It took us over 20 years to get from initial discussions >> to reasonable deployments and we're still working on it. The form of the >> proposal - BCD representation of IP addresses as its best claim to fame - >> initially led me to believe it was a troll proposal rather than something >> serious. I now see the author believes it to be a serious proposal, but I >> also believe that it's 20 years too late and provides no benefit over IPv6. >> I'm willing to be shown wrong, but I'd really like not to read further >> discussions about it on this list until there's something of a buy in from a >> greater crowd. >> >> Mike > > Fair enough. > > 1. How to create a mailing-list, (or Working Group) ? > 2. Should I do it inside / as-part-of IETF, or some 3rd party resource ? > I don't think there is a need for a new mailing list for this topic. Rather, I suggest employing an existing list that we have for larger architecture issues. Info on the list is available at: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss I would encourage folks interested in this topic to participate in the discussion on the architecture-discuss list. Regards, Brian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature