Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have evaluated separating TCP+UDP checksums from pseudo-header,
which gives some new applications:

1. ILNP - Identifier-Link Network Protocol.
2. IPsec-ESP-over-NAT-PT (one obstacle removed; not all)

But slows down other traffic by 0.4% (assuming 1000-byte packets) -
due to +4 bytes checksum at IP layer.
So separating checksums into TCP+IP layers has trade-offs, not a
simple improvement.

-- 
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]