Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Saku Ytti <saku@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14 December 2015 at 23:45, Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> isn't the solution to all of this to just use TLS ? (or DTLS for udp)
>
> Sort of. Or proper L4 like QUIC, MinimaLT. You'll know packet got
> mangled, but troubleshooting which device it was is going to be hell.

So, one option is to go unscrew tcp/udp/IP and make checksums really
work for highspeed usage.. then packets get (if tossed at the IP
layer) at the hop which sees a failed packet checksum... however,
where would the router/switch/etc send the 'yer packet is cruddy' to ?
are you sure that the L3 data is correct at this point? why are you
sure? if a solarflare poked a hole in your packet, how do you know it
didn't poke 2 holes?

I don't think you can reliably figure out which hop caused your
problem :( so ... TLS  (or equivalent in QUIC/MinimalT/etc) is your
only real saving throw.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]