Re: Introducing : Brand-new Internet Protocol "Five Fields"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mike,

If it is  in the form of next generation IP (especially in the context
of upcoming 5G) we welcome the discussions on our list, 5Gangip,
5Gangip@xxxxxxxx to subscribe
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip

Behcet


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mike StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 8:23 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
>> <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> IP protocol version 5 is already defined and in usefor RFC1190, and
>>> that use would have to be deprecatedfirst. Picking 7 is easier; for a
>>> long time someoneon this list was pushing an idea of IPv8... and IPv9.
>>
>> I believe the IPv8 you are referring to was hardly a serious proposal.
>> Regardless, 7, 8 and 9 were reserved for TP/IX, PIP and TUBA
>> respectively.
>>
>>
>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-numbers.xhtml>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>
> At this point I would suggest that the discussion on this topic has exceeded
> the mandate for the list.  I would suggest that creating a separate list and
> announcing it and moving all further discussion on the specifics of this
> proposal to that list would be appropriate.
>
> At the beginning of this discussion the question was asked of why the
> sergeant at arms threatened posting restriction.  I wasn't actually
> surprised at that PR warning as we've already got a replacement for IPv4 in
> the form of IPv6.   It took us over 20 years to get from initial discussions
> to reasonable deployments and we're still working on it. The form of the
> proposal - BCD representation of IP addresses as its best claim to fame -
> initially led me to believe it was a troll proposal rather than something
> serious.  I now see the author believes it to be a serious proposal, but I
> also believe that it's 20 years too late and provides no benefit over IPv6.
> I'm willing to be shown wrong, but I'd really like not to read further
> discussions about it on this list until there's something of a buy in from a
> greater crowd.
>
> Mike
>




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]