On 12/14/2015 03:38 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Robert Withers wrote: > >> In bytes >> 48 = 3 X 16bit port redundency. >> 50 = global address >> 98 = 48bit + 50bit slice >> 294 = 3 X 98bit packet redundancy >> 320 = 294bit + 26bit sanguinity mysticly measured, > > I'm afraid triple redundancy makes effective address space > size smaller (one third of the original). I was thinking each "address" slice was a separate address for purposes of replication towards eventual consistency. As well, this support for EC is in both communications & storage. and even computation itself with 26bits of control flag space. > > Anyway, if you want to have unrealistically large IP address > space, feel free to use IPv6. > > Masataka Ohta > > -- ... ^,^ best regards, robert