Hiya, On 07/12/15 11:23, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > I think there's a piece of backstory here I'm not getting.... > > Den 04. des. 2015 18:05, skrev The IESG: >> The protocols in scope are Secure Shell (SSH), DNSSEC, PKIX, CMS, XML >> Digital Signatures and potentially Kerberos and JSON. > > Why is TLS not included? > > It seems likely that the answer is one of: > > 1) TLS is already up-to-date in the space this group is limited to > 2) TLS work is being done in the TLS working group The latter, and a bit of the former:-) > > In both cases, it would be nice to say so in the charter. The charter text tries to do that generically but does mention TLS specifically in this bit: "Where there is an IETF working group or area group with expertise in a relevant topic the CURDLE working group will defer to the consensus of the more specific working group as to where work will be done. For example, the TLS, OpenPGP and IPSECME WGs are actively considering some of these topics. " Cheers, S. >