>John is correct. >I�ll confirm the addition of these with the IESG. >If any community consultation is needed, they will let us know. > >Thank you John and John. I am remined that RFC 4387 also defines "pgprevocations", same deal. >On 11/14/15, 3:48 PM, "ietf on behalf of John C Klensin" ><ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >>--On Saturday, November 14, 2015 16:31 -0500 John R Levine >><johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I presume this was an oversight, since it would be unfortunate >>> if someone registered different services called certificiates, >>> crls, or pgpkeys. How does one do a retroactive IANA update? >> >>When an omission is this obvious, there is precedent for a >>relevant AD just asking IANA to update the table and IANA doing >>it. Otherwise, we can make a community decision to waste a lot >>of everyone's time :-( >> >> john >> >> > >-=-=-=-=-=- >[Attachment type=application/pkcs7-signature, name=smime.p7s] >-=-=-=-=-=-