Since that particular registry is first come first served for a service only registration, it should not be an issue. John could simply make a request on the IANA portal. Its the Well Known Services registry, same as for port allocation. On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John is correct. > I¹ll confirm the addition of these with the IESG. > If any community consultation is needed, they will let us know. > > Thank you John and John. > > Michelle > > ******* > > Michelle Cotton > Protocol Parameters Engagement Manager > ICANN > > > > On 11/14/15, 3:48 PM, "ietf on behalf of John C Klensin" > <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >>--On Saturday, November 14, 2015 16:31 -0500 John R Levine >><johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I presume this was an oversight, since it would be unfortunate >>> if someone registered different services called certificiates, >>> crls, or pgpkeys. How does one do a retroactive IANA update? >> >>When an omission is this obvious, there is precedent for a >>relevant AD just asking IANA to update the table and IANA doing >>it. Otherwise, we can make a community decision to waste a lot >>of everyone's time :-( >> >> john >> >>