Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:58 PM, John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Those are separate issues.  We strip attachments because people send messages that say "my kid's school play is tomorrow at 7 PM, tickets $5, and here's a poster" and attach a 20MB powerpoint horror.

Seems like you could just bounce messages with attachments larger than X, where X is O(1k).   We have to allow for MUA-specific attachments, but we could even handle those by whitelisting them.   "Fixing" messages with attachments is a convenience, not a requirement.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]