Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm going to put 'retired' as affiliation in all my drafts.

It will save time on editing come publication.

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 22 October 2015 11:21 PM
To: John C Klensin; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?

Le 20/10/2015 18:00, John C Klensin a écrit :
>
>
> --On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 16:44 +0200 Alexandre Petrescu
> <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it unreasonable to have 'retired' in the Organization name
>> of an author of Internet Draft?
>
> While an RFC might be a different matter and, even there, some
> of us with no affiliations relevant to the IETF don't list one,
> why do you think anyone should care what someone else puts in
> the that field of an I-D, at least as long as it is truthful?

Why do I think someone should care?

YEs it is truthful, but I have never seen 'retired'.  I did see
'Independent' and 'Daydreamer'.

Maybe readers should not care.

Alex

>
>     john
>
>
>
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]