RE: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "uta@xxxxxxxx" <uta@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:41:10 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <20150729182718.GQ4347@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Thread-index: AQHQyG6rk9h3BrW2h0q2mNtrGGmxxJ3wR44AgAAGaQCAAs1jAP//r9jg
Thread-topic: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements

It kinda bothers me that at times the entire Internet security policy is being driven solely by data from one particular MTA.

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richsalz@xxxxxxxxx Twitter: RichSalz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Viktor Dukhovni

References:
- E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  - From: Viktor Dukhovni

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02.txt> (Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One on Loopback) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
Previous by thread: Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
Next by thread: Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]