Aaron Zauner <azet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> UTA chairs recommended sending a mail about this to the UTA and IETF
> lists. We're currently analyzing our datasets -- so more/detailed data
> will become available shortly.
> Over the past couple of months we've been collecting SMTP, IMAP and POP
> (implicit TLS, STARTTLS) security measurements (primarily relating to
> TLS, X.509 Certs and offered protocol extensions). I've given a short
> talk at IETF93 in SAAG on the topic, the slides can be found over here:
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-saag-2.pdf
> * RC4 support is at about 83-85% * unsurprisingly TLS 1.0 is most
RC4 is supported by 83% of end points that support crypto, or of 83% of
end points that answer TCP?
What percentage support some kind of crypto, even if we might call it pretend
crypto now.
I didn't see the total number of hosts scanned in the slides.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature