--On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 05:23 -0400 "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > those 3 people plus the ISOC appointed IAOC member can not be > chair > > asking one of these does make sense - but I think that should > not be in this "update BCP 101" document Agree on the document. > fwiw - Ray has been actually running the process for at least > as long as I've been on the IAOC that does not mean that he > should continue to do so, it is just a factoid To be clear, while I think the optics are bad, as long as it is Ray, I don't have a problem. But I don't want to see anything written into a spec that would have to be adjusted or undone if Ray's successor had a different personality or set of skills. So, again, saying nothing, or explicitly leaving it up to the IAOC each time, seems appropriate to me. john