Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:52 PM, David Conrad <drc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John,
>
> ...
>
> The root zone is NOT the entire top-level of the identifier space. It is the top-level of the subset of the identifier space that is comprised of (a) strings that are valid in the DNS protocol ...
>
> Even if you meant "what could potentially be placed in the root zone", this would still be limited by (a) by the simple fact that the root zone is a DNS protocol implementation artifact, not a namespace artifact, and is thus constrained by the limitations of the DNS protocol.

If you truly mean the DNS protocol, as opposed to various user
interfaces or conventions, labels in DNS names are binary byte strings
restricted only by a maximum length of 63 bytes (and the minimum
length zero is only permitted as indicating the root). Interesting
byte values such as 0x00 or 0xFF work just fine inside labels in the
DNS protocol.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]